My Vote in the Australian Federal Election 2025

I’m not one that usually shares my political views that openly. Generally, those close to me already know how I feel about things, and I don’t want to impose my views on others who probably don’t care. Those who are observant can probably pick it out from my Mastodon (and earlier, Twitter) reposts.

However, I feel a bit differently about the state of the world this year. And I’ve also reasoned with myself that I’m not going to tell anybody how to vote. But I will tell you who I’m going to vote for, why I’m going to vote for them, and why I’m telling you who I’m voting for.

I’m going to tackle that last point first. I’m well aware that as a mid-thirties straight white male living in the “global north” (a term I loathe with the power of a thousand suns, as a resident of Hobart and the Huon Valley the only place I’m north of is Antarctica) I have a lot of privilege in being able to share my views without placing myself in any danger. And I’d like to perhaps speak for others who aren’t quite so able to speak for themselves.

Secondly, who I’m going to vote for. It’s important to note that in Australia we have preferential voting, so you can put minor parties or candidates first, and go down the list in decreasing order of how much you want them to represent you until finally you end up at the party who you least want to represent you.

I said “want to represent” there, not “will be the best for me”. That’s critical. I’m already (relatively) well off. There are more important issues than my personal well being, and I believe that what’s good for society and the environment will be best for me in the end.

In my electorate of Franklin, there are five candidates (as I write this, anyway) and my ranking of them is as follows:

  1. Peter George, Independent
  2. Owen Fitzgerald, Greens
  3. Julie Collins, ALP
  4. Brendan Blomely, Independent
  5. Josh Garvin, Liberal
  6. Stefan Popescu, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation

“Five” candidates and yet the list has six? A demonstration of why, despite absolutely loving the Greens as a concept, they completely fail as a modern political party. This is basic stuff. Like white girl ordering pumpkin spice lattes kind of basic.

My first preference will be for Peter George. He’s running primarily on an anti-salmon farming platform, but has a complete policy platform that I quite like. And my take on the salmon farming issue? If you can’t run an industry for 100 or more years in the way that it’s currently being run, it’s an unsustainable industry. And we shouldn’t be taking from our children’s future just to make profits now. This is also why I’m opposed to generative AI / large language models (ChatGPT, Deepseek, etc) and cryptocurrency. Is there a way of running all of these industries in sustainable ways? Yes (although in the case of crypto I’m less sure). Are we doing so? No. So something needs to change.

My second preference will go to Julie Collins. Whilst I’d like the ALP to win the election, I believe that Julie Collins has been safe in her seat for far too long and is not representing or delivering results for the people of Franklin. She needs a scare, and I really hope that Peter George delivers her a scare (at the very least). I want to make her to work again.

My third preference will go to the Greens, but for what purpose I don’t know. But if I rank them below the others I couldn’t forgive myself.

After that it gets depressing. The Liberal party is probably more preferable to me than either One Nation or Brendan Blomely, but that’s hardly saying much. I have a lot of queer friends that I care about a lot, and any candidate that wants to make their lives harder is not a candidate for me. Then there’s the issue of migration. A lot of people are opposed to migration either because it’s “bad for the culture” or “increasing property prices”. On property prices, just change the law so only citizens and permanent residents (or companies majority owned by citizens and permanent residents) can own property, like most other countries do. Sorted. And on culture? The culture of Australia is by definition a multi-cultural one. My family are migrants, and just because I’m white doesn’t mean I should ignore that fact. Every single person in Australia either came from somewhere else or has ancestors who did. Every. Single. Person. Even the Aboriginal people.

That was a bit of a ramble.

I’ll be voting in the senate in a similar way to the house of representatives. Now that Eric Abetz is a member of the Tasmanian parliament rather than a senate candidate, I no longer feel compelled to vote below the line just to put him dead last, so I’ll be saving some time by voting above the line for the party groups.

Finally, I hope you can all join me watching the ABC election coverage on election night, for no other reason than that it is Antony Green’s last election. What a legendary man.

Photo of Antony Green from Wikipedia.

Australian Pomp and Ceremony

As Australians, we’ve always been very uncomfortable with who we are. Descendants of British settlers feel nervous about how Aboriginal people were treated (and to some extent still are). Aboriginal people feel uncomfortable because they have been made to feel like second-class citizens for a large part of our history (because they were). More recent immigrants are locked away in detention centres, despite our national anthem’s promise of having “boundless plains to share”.

It’s no wonder, then, that when Australia Day rolls around, everybody gets a little bit confused. Nobody knows quite how they feel about giving out Knighthoods and Damehoods again, but we’re pretty sure they shouldn’t go to a racist old fart who isn’t even Australian. I feel personally that knighthoods are a great addition to the Order of Australia, and it’s good they are being given out again. However, they should be recommended by the Order of Australia Council with no involvement from the Prime Minister.

Things like the Australian Flag should fill every Australian with a sense of pride in our country. Unfortunately, when I see it I feel a sense of shame, as it has become associated with racism and other forms of bigotry. It’s unfortunate that these things which should unite us instead tear us apart.

A lot of people say we need to talk about who we are as a country. That usually means becoming a republic. That’s not going to help one way or the other. We need to make a lot of small changes, that together will make every citizen feel a part of Australia.

Firstly, we need to live up to our promise in the national anthem: for those who come across the seas, we should share our plains with you. Being more civil to refugees should be top priority. We can’t treat people as sub-human any longer. These people are escaping terrible places. Why else would you get in a leaky boat and sail across the ocean with only a mild hope that you might get to Australia? I understand the need to perform security and quarantine checks on people before we let them into the wider community. But these checks can be done in days or weeks, not months or years. They can also be done on the Australian mainland, not a foreign country. To do otherwise is pandering to bigots, and that’s not something I want my country to be known for.

Our honours system needs some work, as I’ve outlined above. We should have Knighthoods and Damehoods, as they are internationally recognised and bestow a fine honour amongst those people who deserve them. But we should have more conversation about who gets them. I think only Australian citizens should be eligible. I think only the Order of Australia council should be able to recommend to the Queen who gets them, with no political involvement from the Prime Minister or his office.

It’s about time we changed our flag, too. The problem is, to what. I don’t have a solution here. Some people have suggested replacing the union jack with the aboriginal flag, but that then diminishes the contribution given by the British settlers to this nation. Far better, I think, to not acknowledge any particular race on our flag; we are all the same on the inside after all.

Australian flag with the aboriginal flag replacing the union jack.
The proposed replacement flag.

I’m really happy with the trend I’ve been seeing in the last few years of having a  “Welcome to country” by Aboriginal community representatives for formal events. I’ve even been to technical conferences where this has occurred! This seems to me to be a very subtle and inclusive way to acknowledge the history of the land on which this country is built.

One thing that I don’t think is particularly helpful is a discussion about being a republic. There are actually far more important things to get fixed, and we can fix them without spending years fighting amongst ourselves over who gets to be our head of state. Whilst I’m not against a republic, and would probably vote for one if a referendum was held today, I think both the current Queen and her successors are doing a fine job. Whilst a lot of people dislike Prince Charles, I can’t figure out why: he spends a lot of time fighting for good causes. He’s an environmental campaigner, and I like that.

Queen Elizabeth II firing a machine gun.
The queen, meanwhile, is pretty epic.

Whilst it’s uncomfortable to talk about who we are, sometimes these discussions are necessary in order to better ourselves. Every citizen will never be equal (capitalism and human power struggles will team up to prevent that from ever happening). We should endeavour, in any case, to give every citizen equal opportunities, as far as we can. We need to make every person feel included in our country of Australia.

On Julian Assange & Political Asylum

Within the last 24 hours, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has been granted political asylum by Ecuador. Earlier this week, the Ecuadorian embassy in London reported that British police had threatened to storm the embassy in order to bring Julian Assange to justice. ABC News report here. Here are my thoughts on the matter:

Whoever it was that thought up the idea to storm an embassy must be completely bonkers… a single prisoner isn’t worth an act of war. To quote M in the James Bond movie Casino Royale: “You stormed into an Embassy. You violated the only absolutely inviolate rule of international relations…” I never understood why that was so until I discovered that an embassy is actually the territory of the country in question, so British police would be storming into Ecuador, pretty much. Not a good look.

It’s interesting that out of all the embassies in London that Julian Assange could have taken refuge in, he chose Ecuador. I suspect this was because Ecuador is one of the few countries that isn’t in bed with the United States… unlike Australia. Julian Assange is a citizen of Australia, and the Australian government should have offered Assange a far greater degree of assistance than they have. In essence, Assange seeking political asylum in Ecuador is basically saying that putting himself in Australia’s hands would have put him in personal danger. That’s not a thought I feel comfortable with, as the freedom from political persecution is a right I believe everybody should have.

I suspect the reason Australia haven’t given Assange more support is Geo-political in nature. Australia cannot defend itself in the case of invasion from either Indonesia or China (who I have little doubt would love to invade Australia for the sheer landmass that would afford them). We need the United States to offer us defense support, which is why they have air force bases in the Northern Territory (much as we don’t like them, they are a necessity for national security). If we support Assange against the United States, we’re basically giving a big F-you to the United States, which they won’t like very much… and on it goes.

Of course, this presupposes that Sweden has ulterior motives in it’s prosecution against Assange (that it wants to prosecute him simply to send him to the United States for further question), which is debatable. Very, very likely is that the CIA and FBI would like to question Assange, probably in a dark room somewhere.I remember reading about debate amongst academics in the US as to whether Assange had actually committed a crime (the gist is basically that he didn’t actually leak anything, just publish those leaks; not sure how legitimate those claims are) and thus whether a civilian (I guess US Supreme) court would convict would be marginal.

Basically, nobody could ever predict the outcome of what all this will be… but the way things have played out so far makes perfect sense. With that said, I believe Australia should offer Assange more support, starting now. The more teeth Australia shows in this matter, the more we can stand up and say we believe in human rights.

And then we can do something about the non-illegal “illegal asylum seekers”… but’s that for another day.